| 1 |
On 15/06/2013 23:47, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 Jun 2013, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> "restrict+http:" (as suggested by the OP) is probably not enough |
| 5 |
>>> because it doesn't distinguish between fetch and mirror |
| 6 |
>>> restriction. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> nofetch+http and nomirror+http ? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Or the other way around: {fetch,mirror}+http. I'd rather have RESTRICT |
| 11 |
> apply to all of SRC_URI (as it is now) and use the new syntax to |
| 12 |
> specify any exceptions from the restriction. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Ulrich |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I like this idea. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michael |
Archives