Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml?
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2007 22:37:17
Message-Id: 45F87788.6010906@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? by Ciaran McCreesh
1 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
2 <snip>
3 >> Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else
4 >> could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a
5 >> group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others
6 >> have informed us all.
7 >
8 > Case in point: you need to distinguish between flameeyes leaving (again)
9 > as a publicity stunt because his attempt to blackmail devrel failed and
10 > flameeyes' stated reason for leaving...
11 >
12 <snip>
13
14 It was an ultimatum. He goes or I go, it was not blackmail. FFS, can
15 we please stop calling it blackmail?
16 --
17 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gentoo-dev vs lkml? Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>