| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:30:32 -0500
|
| 5 |
Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 8 |
> <snip> |
| 9 |
> >> Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else |
| 10 |
> >> could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a |
| 11 |
> >> group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others |
| 12 |
> >> have informed us all. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > Case in point: you need to distinguish between flameeyes leaving (again) |
| 15 |
> > as a publicity stunt because his attempt to blackmail devrel failed and |
| 16 |
> > flameeyes' stated reason for leaving... |
| 17 |
> > |
| 18 |
> <snip> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> It was an ultimatum. He goes or I go, it was not blackmail. FFS, can |
| 21 |
> we please stop calling it blackmail? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
As I recall, flameeyes made the statement to kloeri, and kloeri called
|
| 24 |
it blackmail. Whatever you call it, in business, issuing such an
|
| 25 |
ultimatum is one of the quickest ways to become unemployed.
|
| 26 |
> -- |
| 27 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Regards,
|
| 30 |
- --
|
| 31 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
|
| 32 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc, Devrel)
|
| 33 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 34 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6-ecc01.6 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
iD8DBQFF+HzzQa6M3+I///cRAgbrAKDegV4ZTzktAo3xspKdFZtXv4NWgwCgnWHc
|
| 37 |
0JtrXM0K3jT7G10qqWTrGYI=
|
| 38 |
=ciKo
|
| 39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 40 |
éí¢‡^¾§¶Š(® šŠX§‚X¬ |
Archives