| 1 |
Ferris McCormick wrote: |
| 2 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 3 |
> Hash: SHA1 |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:30:32 -0500 |
| 6 |
> Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 10 |
>> <snip> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>>>> Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else |
| 13 |
>>>> could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a |
| 14 |
>>>> group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others |
| 15 |
>>>> have informed us all. |
| 16 |
>>>> |
| 17 |
>>> Case in point: you need to distinguish between flameeyes leaving (again) |
| 18 |
>>> as a publicity stunt because his attempt to blackmail devrel failed and |
| 19 |
>>> flameeyes' stated reason for leaving... |
| 20 |
>>> |
| 21 |
>>> |
| 22 |
>> <snip> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> It was an ultimatum. He goes or I go, it was not blackmail. FFS, can |
| 25 |
>> we please stop calling it blackmail? |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> As I recall, flameeyes made the statement to kloeri, and kloeri called |
| 29 |
> it blackmail. Whatever you call it, in business, issuing such an |
| 30 |
> ultimatum is one of the quickest ways to become unemployed. |
| 31 |
So you'd rather let one of the best employees go rather than chastise a |
| 32 |
worker who is leaving soon? Thats just cutting off your nose to spite |
| 33 |
your face. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
It's good to see it has only taken 3 or is it 4 or 5 devs to leave |
| 36 |
before anyone thinks about doing something. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
George |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives