1 |
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 00:35 +0000, George Prowse wrote: |
2 |
> Ferris McCormick wrote: |
3 |
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
4 |
> > Hash: SHA1 |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 17:30:32 -0500 |
7 |
> > Steev Klimaszewski <steev@g.o> wrote: |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> >> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
11 |
> >> <snip> |
12 |
> >> |
13 |
> >>>> Personally I understand why flameeyes took that to bugzilla; how else |
14 |
> >>>> could he say he'd gone thru the appropriate channels? Devrel (a |
15 |
> >>>> group, not an individual) weren't set up to respond quickly as others |
16 |
> >>>> have informed us all. |
17 |
> >>>> |
18 |
> >>> Case in point: you need to distinguish between flameeyes leaving (again) |
19 |
> >>> as a publicity stunt because his attempt to blackmail devrel failed and |
20 |
> >>> flameeyes' stated reason for leaving... |
21 |
> >>> |
22 |
> >>> |
23 |
> >> <snip> |
24 |
> >> |
25 |
> >> It was an ultimatum. He goes or I go, it was not blackmail. FFS, can |
26 |
> >> we please stop calling it blackmail? |
27 |
> >> |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > As I recall, flameeyes made the statement to kloeri, and kloeri called |
30 |
> > it blackmail. Whatever you call it, in business, issuing such an |
31 |
> > ultimatum is one of the quickest ways to become unemployed. |
32 |
> So you'd rather let one of the best employees go rather than chastise a |
33 |
> worker who is leaving soon? Thats just cutting off your nose to spite |
34 |
> your face. |
35 |
> |
36 |
|
37 |
You misunderstand. The analogy is that I walk into my boss's office and |
38 |
say "Fire Joe or I'm gone", in which case I can expect to be gone one |
39 |
way or the other. |
40 |
|
41 |
> It's good to see it has only taken 3 or is it 4 or 5 devs to leave |
42 |
> before anyone thinks about doing something. |
43 |
> |
44 |
> George |
45 |
-- |
46 |
Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o> |
47 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux (Devrel, Sparc) |