| 1 |
Marius Mauch said: |
| 2 |
> On 07/21/04 Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Wouldn't a new file called ChangeLog.xml solve this? If it exists, use |
| 4 |
>> it. If not, default to the old plain-text ChangeLog. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Not really. |
| 7 |
> How do you make sure a dev adds new entries the XML version if it |
| 8 |
> exists? (in the case of multiple/no maintainers or arch maintainers) |
| 9 |
> Tools would have to merge the logs internally to be useful. |
| 10 |
> Supporting both formats will be a real PITA. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Only allow one of the two to exist for a given package. We'd need a tool |
| 13 |
to migrate, echangelog would need to get smarter (as already mentioned) |
| 14 |
and repoman would need to enforce this. Could provide a way to |
| 15 |
autogenerate a plain-text ChangeLog from a ChangeLog.xml also. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives