1 |
Denis Dupeyron wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 12:45 PM, Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> Before the flames start lets consider the Package Manager Specification |
4 |
>> (PMS) as an example. For this (very black and white) illustration, |
5 |
>> forget the council discussions to date and imagine that representatives |
6 |
>> of all three package managers went to council and said in unison |
7 |
>> "We have agreed this specification". |
8 |
>> Are council really going to start picking holes in it and say no? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> The council being our global technical lead, I can't see why they |
11 |
> wouldn't be allowed to reject an agreed package manager specification |
12 |
> or parts of it. If not, why bother electing them at all ? Not that I |
13 |
> think that would be a smart move, but that's a different discussion. |
14 |
> |
15 |
|
16 |
Well, obviously there is a balance here, but one thing that Roy pointed |
17 |
out that I completely agree with is the need to have most of the |
18 |
discussion BEFORE the meeting. |
19 |
|
20 |
A council meeting is a very time-limited event which is really designed |
21 |
to officially ratify decisions that have essentially already been made. |
22 |
The best place to have open discussion and debate over an issue is on |
23 |
mailing lists/etc - this allows the widest possible community to |
24 |
participate, and gives people time to consider their decisions. Policy |
25 |
shouldn't be decided by what the best shoot-from-the-hip argument was at |
26 |
a 1 hour meeting. |
27 |
|
28 |
Maybe if an item is on the agenda and it doesn't really have consensus |
29 |
there is some value to 5 minutes of free discussion, followed by a delay |
30 |
for one month to hash it out on lists/etc. |
31 |
|
32 |
For the most part I think the current council has embraced this, |
33 |
although most of the discussion on lists do not involve council members |
34 |
themselves (though they clearly follow the discussions). |
35 |
-- |
36 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |