| 1 |
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:30:55 -0700 |
| 2 |
Mike Doty <kingtaco@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Grant Goodyear wrote: |
| 4 |
> [snip] |
| 5 |
> > PS. So, anybody have any actual technical comments about this |
| 6 |
> > proposal? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Yes. pioto's proposal is weak. lu_zero's counterproposal for |
| 9 |
> developing a method of having a package manager agnostic "API" is |
| 10 |
> much more useful than developing one language binding for one package |
| 11 |
> manager. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Assuming you mean piotr, who is not pioto... The difference is, piotr's |
| 14 |
proposal is possible and doable within the timeframe, whereas lu_zero's |
| 15 |
sounds nice if you don't know anything about any of the package |
| 16 |
managers in question and can't be delivered within three months. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives