1 |
Personally, I do not think the tree is the place for anything besides |
2 |
that which relates to the tree. I really do not think users would |
3 |
appreciate there sync being burdoned by "Developer x broke his toe |
4 |
this week" ; "developer y is going to italy" ; "We recently recieved 3 |
5 |
new mirrors" and have all this shown on their screen. |
6 |
|
7 |
This feature should only be used for things that are directly related |
8 |
to the tree, and will cause mass breakage if ignored. |
9 |
|
10 |
On 11/20/05, Stuart Herbert <stuart@g.o> wrote: |
11 |
> On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 13:06 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
12 |
> > Huh? |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > I was using it as an example of something that I would not be interested |
15 |
> > in seeing in *my* tree since I wouldn't ever be able to attend. What |
16 |
> > did you think I meant by it. Did I at any point say that the UK dev |
17 |
> > meets are a bad thing? |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I felt that you laboured the point beyond what was reasonable. It's a |
20 |
> mis-understanding on my part, and I apologise. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> > > The events I've been involved in organising have been events for users, |
23 |
> > > and they've always been put together by both developers and users. I |
24 |
> > > believe that some of our users *are* interested in exactly this type of |
25 |
> > > news - and, from the enquiries I've had in the past, not just UK-based |
26 |
> > > people. |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > Not in the tree. There is already a place for this stuff. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> Delivering news via this mechanism allows us to reach far more people |
31 |
> than we can via the other places. If we could already reach everyone, |
32 |
> we wouldn't need this mechanism in the first place. |
33 |
> |
34 |
> > It really sounds like you are wanting to make this proposal way too |
35 |
> > complex, but I'll wait for the actual GLEP text before making any more |
36 |
> > comments. |
37 |
> |
38 |
> I don't see the complexity here. We're proposing a capability to |
39 |
> deliver news direct to our users, in a way that can be completely |
40 |
> disabled or personalised. How many large corporations would kill to |
41 |
> have something that could do that? ;-) |
42 |
> |
43 |
> If I can't convince you of the merits, I guess there's nothing else for |
44 |
> it but to continue work on delivering the proposal without your |
45 |
> support :( |
46 |
> |
47 |
> Best regards, |
48 |
> Stu |
49 |
> -- |
50 |
> Stuart Herbert stuart@g.o |
51 |
> Gentoo Developer |
52 |
> |
53 |
> |
54 |
|
55 |
-- |
56 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |