| 1 |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:10, Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> How about playing nicely with overlays where the moves didn't happen |
| 3 |
> (yet)? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I'm not a developer, but based on my experience, playing nicely with |
| 6 |
overlays in general is a can of worms, and as far as I can tell has to |
| 7 |
do with the fact that overlays have always needed to react to changes |
| 8 |
in portage tree. (For example, if an overlay has pkg-0.1-r1 that fixes |
| 9 |
a bug, and in portage tree 0.2 is available but still has the bug, |
| 10 |
then the overlay needs to have a 0.2-r1.) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'm not sure you have to worry about overlays. The developers of the |
| 13 |
overlays will worry about them. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Now, for the educated: is this fair or accurate? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Jacob |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
"For then there will be great distress, unequaled |
| 21 |
from the beginning of the world until now — and never |
| 22 |
to be equaled again. If those days had not been cut |
| 23 |
short, no one would survive, but for the sake of the |
| 24 |
elect those days will be shortened." |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Are you ready? |
Archives