1 |
On 11 July 2012 02:30, William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> All, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> the last thread started by mgorny has prompted me to ask here on the |
5 |
> list which versions of udev we really need in the tree. |
6 |
|
7 |
Personally, I'm holding on to 171. I have masked >=181 because of |
8 |
bad decisions upstream and I want to see how the situation will |
9 |
stabilize. |
10 |
|
11 |
Since 171 is the latest stable, I would think most of our users are |
12 |
on this version anyway. |
13 |
|
14 |
Since upstream seems to be unwilling to work with us, I think |
15 |
we should seriously consider doing a fork. I know there are |
16 |
other distros like Debian and Slackware who would be happy |
17 |
to join us in that effort. |
18 |
|
19 |
-- |
20 |
Cheers, |
21 |
|
22 |
Ben | yngwin |
23 |
Gentoo developer |
24 |
Gentoo Qt project lead, Gentoo Wiki admin |