1 |
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003 16:42:36 +0200 |
2 |
Sven Blumenstein <me@××××××.net> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I agree with that. I did read about ufed and mirrorselect here on the |
5 |
> mailing list first. It should at least get mentioned in the install |
6 |
> docs and maybe also included on the LiveCD as it would have much use |
7 |
> on installation. |
8 |
|
9 |
Don't know about the LiveCD's, haven't tried one for quite a while. But |
10 |
people not knowing about one or the other tool I encounter quite often. |
11 |
|
12 |
> >And creative like I feel today I |
13 |
> > already came up with a code name for this proposal, "Emergency". ;-) |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Heh, I like that name ;) |
17 |
|
18 |
Thanks. |
19 |
|
20 |
> And the idea behind it sounds good aswell. But instead of adding |
21 |
> another new package, I would add the above mentioned tools to |
22 |
> app-admin/gentoolkit together with the frontend. That way you could |
23 |
> use every programm standalone or use it from the "Emergency" menu. |
24 |
|
25 |
Hm, that doesn't sound bad either. But sometimes I have the feeling that |
26 |
gentoolkit is a collection of tools which don't have a place yet (like |
27 |
etc-update moving to portage, epm becoming it's own package), but I |
28 |
might as well be wrong on that. |
29 |
|
30 |
> As for the programming part, in my opinion shell scripts with use of |
31 |
> "dialog" for the GUI are a good option. |
32 |
|
33 |
Afer looking at ufed's code I realised that it also uses dialog. But |
34 |
it's written in Perl. And actually I think that giving the possibility |
35 |
to write a plug-in for "Emergency" in a variety of languages makes it |
36 |
more attractive. But still, nothing against the use of dialog (or |
37 |
Xdialog[1] for a GTK version of "Emergency"). |
38 |
|
39 |
Michael |
40 |
|
41 |
[1] http://www.chez.com/godefroy/ |
42 |
|
43 |
|
44 |
-- |
45 |
www.cargal.org |
46 |
GnuPG-key-ID: 0x90CA09E3 |
47 |
Jabber-ID: citizen428 [at] cargal [dot] org |
48 |
Registered Linux User #278726 |