Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 05:13:18
Message-Id: CAHmME9pebu6vi9W1hHu+emx6AwVb1es-VJhQ5t82DJTyDq22hQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor? by Mike Frysinger
1 On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:12, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote:
2 >
3 > > Wait... Is anybody here *actually opposed* to not enabling PIE on *SUID
4 > > binaries*?
5 >
6 > he was talking system wide
7 >
8
9 This thread is about PIE on SUID executables.
10
11
12 >
13 > considering the number set*id binaries in the tree, and their requirements
14 > (they tend to not be performance sensitive in the slightest), i don't have
15 > a
16 > problem with steering them in the PIE direction.
17 >
18
19 Great!
20
21
22 >
23 > ignoring /usr/bin/Xorg here of course, but that has a lot more problems
24 > that i
25 > doubt PIE will make much of a difference.
26 >
27
28 Oh boy. Yea. Oh boy. Xorg should be PIE too, I suppose. Only takes
29 one rotten egg.
30
31
32
33 > -mike
34 >