Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:27:36
Message-Id: 57629B21.3060308@iee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization by "Michał Górny"
1 On 16/06/16 13:04, Michał Górny wrote:
2 > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200
3 > Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
4 >
5 >> Right now we have the following components:
6 >>
7 >> - Applications,
8 >> - baselayout,
9 >> - Core system,
10 >> - Development,
11 >> - Eclasses and Profiles,
12 >> - Games,
13 >> - GCC Porting,
14 >> - GNOME,
15 >> - Hardened,
16 >> - Java,
17 >> - KDE,
18 >> - Keywording & Stabilization,
19 >> - Library,
20 >> - New packages ('New ebuilds' previously),
21 >> - Printing,
22 >> - SELinux,
23 >> - Server,
24 >> - Unspecified.
25 > Revision two:
26 >
27 > - Current packages [bug-wranglers@],
28 > - Eclasses [bug-wranglers@],
29 > - Hardened [hardened@],
30 > - New packages [bug-wranglers@],
31 > - Overlays [overlays@],
32 > - Profiles [bug-wranglers@],
33 > - SELinux [selinux@].
34 >
35 > Major changes:
36 >
37 > 1. collapsed all category-like components into a single 'Current
38 > packages' that is the default component for pretty much every bug
39 > related to 'standard' configurations of Gentoo Linux -- making it easy
40 > to choose the correct one and ensuring everything goes through
41 > bug-wranglers;
42 >
43 > 2. split 'eclasses & profiles' into two separate categories -- mainly
44 > intended for developer use;
45 >
46 > 3. left 'Hardened' and 'SELinux' (also the whole separate Gentoo/Alt
47 > product) as the non-standard system configurations that desire staging
48 > the bugs through respective teams,
49 >
50 > 4. left 'New packages' as-is, as category for requesting addition
51 > of packages not yet in Gentoo,
52 >
53 > 5. added 'Overlays' component for bugs filed against packages
54 > in third-party repositories (right now some of them got filed pretty
55 > randomly, and having them in Infra->Overlays is kinda wrong),
56 >
57 > 6. removed 'Keywording & stabilization'. As pointed out, those can be
58 > handled via keywords and we already do stabilizations in other places
59 > (e.g. security bugs).
60 >
61 > Your thoughts about this one?
62 >
63 Looks good. +1 here.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature