| 1 |
On Monday 09 August 2004 5:52 am, Kurt Lieber wrote: |
| 2 |
> The only "extra" thing we've talked about so far is a separate rsync |
| 3 |
> module that has the --delete option removed (but is otherwise identical |
| 4 |
> to the gentoo-portage module) |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Come up with a better way to *guarantee* ebuilds stay in the tree for a |
| 7 |
> minimum length of time and I'm all for it. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
That sounds reasonable to me. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I was trying to clarify if GLEP19 was going to recommend setting up another |
| 12 |
tree in CVS (which IMO results in duplication of effort and resources.) |
| 13 |
That would be my only objection. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Cheers, |
| 16 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 17 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives