| 1 |
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 01:04:49AM -0400 or thereabouts, Dylan Carlson wrote: |
| 2 |
> However, if we propose using a different tree, repo or branch tags for |
| 3 |
> enterprise, I'm not a big fan of that approach. IMO it should be taken |
| 4 |
> incrementally; that is, get it to work in the existing tree w/ new |
| 5 |
> profiles, and if there is some implementation problem getting enterprise |
| 6 |
> to co-exist with everything else, move it out. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
The only "extra" thing we've talked about so far is a separate rsync module |
| 9 |
that has the --delete option removed (but is otherwise identical to the |
| 10 |
gentoo-portage module) |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Come up with a better way to *guarantee* ebuilds stay in the tree for a |
| 13 |
minimum length of time and I'm all for it. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
--kurt |
Archives