| 1 |
Hi Christian, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 10-10-2007 17:31:17 +0200, Christian Parpart wrote: |
| 4 |
... |
| 5 |
> However, knowing that portage for Solaris (10) is only available via a prefix |
| 6 |
> is not the problem, but knowing that for solaris you have to use a completely |
| 7 |
> different portage tree which is just lagging behind is a real pain. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Which/what tree are you using? |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> i'm not that familiar with this prefixed development as the maintainers |
| 12 |
> itself, but i don't think it's a big deal to tag those ebuilds with |
| 13 |
> solaris-x86 (for example) that are $EPREFIX aware, isn't it? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Which system are you using? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
I know of three such systems, that's why I'm asking. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Fabian Groffen |
| 22 |
Gentoo on a different level |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives