| 1 |
On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" <realnc@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> |
| 6 |
wrote: |
| 7 |
>>> |
| 8 |
>>> And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same |
| 9 |
>>> discussion again? |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
>> Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it |
| 13 |
>> could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future |
| 14 |
>> hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> Well, even though I wasn't happy to see tvtime getting tree-cleaned, I |
| 18 |
understand that Gentoo doesn't work with hired packagers. This isn't |
| 19 |
Ubuntu or RedHat Linux. Gentoo packagers don't maintain what they're not |
| 20 |
interested in. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> In the end it's another program that will end up in my ~/bin directory. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
Why? Don't you want to work with me and maintain it together? Why keep it |
| 27 |
working just for you? |
Archives