| 1 |
On 24/03/13 23:12, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Mar 24, 2013 8:51 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" <realnc@×××××.com |
| 4 |
> <mailto:realnc@×××××.com>> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > On 24/03/13 22:25, Matt Turner wrote: |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras |
| 9 |
> <hwoarang@g.o <mailto:hwoarang@g.o>> wrote: |
| 10 |
> >>> |
| 11 |
> >>> And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same |
| 12 |
> >>> discussion again? |
| 13 |
> >> |
| 14 |
> >> |
| 15 |
> >> Can't this be restated as "Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it |
| 16 |
> >> could have bugs in the future?"? Tree cleaning packages over future |
| 17 |
> >> hypothetical bugs seems like bad policy. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > |
| 20 |
> > Well, even though I wasn't happy to see tvtime getting tree-cleaned, |
| 21 |
> I understand that Gentoo doesn't work with hired packagers. This isn't |
| 22 |
> Ubuntu or RedHat Linux. Gentoo packagers don't maintain what they're |
| 23 |
> not interested in. |
| 24 |
> > |
| 25 |
> > In the end it's another program that will end up in my ~/bin directory. |
| 26 |
> > |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Why? Don't you want to work with me and maintain it together? Why keep |
| 30 |
> it working just for you? |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
I can do that. Though the current ebuild seems to work just fine. |
| 33 |
There's no "alsa" USE flag and it builds with automake 1.13. |
Archives