| 1 |
On Monday 06 October 2008 16:07:14 Jeremy Olexa wrote: |
| 2 |
> Does it *really* matter if these under-staffed "odd" arches |
| 3 |
> have a stable tree or not? If there is a problem with a stable package |
| 4 |
> right now, will there be a new version marked stable in a reasonable |
| 5 |
> amount of time? I think we can conclude that having a stable tree for |
| 6 |
> understaffed arches might cause more harm than good. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
how exactly do you propose we sanely build stages for such arches then ? |
| 9 |
short answer: you cant. |
| 10 |
-mike |
Archives