Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:31:30 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20070413162457.77d8b26c@snowflake | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) by Mike Frysinger |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:11:07 -0400 |
| 2 | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > > Except there are. Hence why we want EAPI 1 in the short term, not |
| 4 | > > several years from now. The stuff that will take longer can go into |
| 5 | > > a later EAPI. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | > this is really up to the portage team to drive |
| 8 | |
| 9 | If they instead decide that EAPI 1 is a long term goal, will the |
| 10 | Council intervene? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 1 (Was: Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April) | Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> |