1 |
On Wed, 8 May 2013 13:37:51 -0400 |
2 |
Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Bottom line is that none of this should really be inconveniencing |
5 |
> maintainers much - nobody is required to create unit files. However, |
6 |
> if a friendly user submits a bug with one attached, then the |
7 |
> maintainer should strongly consider adding them to the package at the |
8 |
> next convenient time. |
9 |
|
10 |
Indeed no maintainer should be bothered with having his package install |
11 |
a unit file, though two points. |
12 |
|
13 |
A maintainer usually dislikes adding something contributed by a user |
14 |
that he doesn't know about / can't verify . So letting systemd herd |
15 |
picking unit files and committing them I think is reasonable. The |
16 |
chance for screwing with a package by just adding the unit file are |
17 |
close to zero even if not familiar with the package. |
18 |
|
19 |
The other thing is those unit files really should come from upstream |
20 |
and other distributions urge their developers to work with upstream [1] |
21 |
Therefore I'd require an upstream bug for each unit that we add. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Unit_Files |