| 1 |
Alec Warner schrieb: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 9:54 AM Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o |
| 3 |
> <mailto:dilfridge@g.o>> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Someone needs to grow up here. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Meh, to me (someone who can't commit to ::gentoo) I have a few concerns here. |
| 9 |
> First, I don't see a lot of QA reverts on the gentoo-dev list. Is it common |
| 10 |
> practice to post reverts publicly? Second, I'm not aware that we would revert |
| 11 |
> for things like this. Most of the items you mention look fairly minor (maybe |
| 12 |
> the python comment looks impactful?) Why can't we fix these items in a future |
| 13 |
> commit, rather than revert? What did Patrice's commit break? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
If the issues are so serious that we have to prevent any breakage/regressions |
| 16 |
from reaching users, I guess an alternative response would have been to |
| 17 |
p.mask the offending new ebuild. Unless the commit caused some tree-wide |
| 18 |
breakage which I can't see here however. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Best regards, |
| 22 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn |
Archives