1 |
On 2020-04-26 15:46, Kent Fredric wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:38:54 +0200 |
3 |
> Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Let's assume we will get reports that app-misc/foo is only installed 20 |
6 |
>> times. If you are going to judge based on this data, "Obviously, nobody |
7 |
>> is using that package, it's stuck on <whatever>... safe to remove" your |
8 |
>> view is biased: |
9 |
> |
10 |
> I see this as more like what bloom filters get you, but in reverse: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> [...] |
13 |
> |
14 |
> - But now, instead of having "we don't know if anybody uses this", you |
15 |
> *can* have a "we know for sure somebody uses this". |
16 |
|
17 |
But how does that information really help us to decide anything in the end? |
18 |
|
19 |
Case A, stats are showing 0 users: |
20 |
|
21 |
Like said, we can't know if this is true or if this package is only used |
22 |
in setups where people don't report stats. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Case B, stats are showing x users: |
26 |
|
27 |
Now what? Package from case A could have similar users -- we just don't |
28 |
know. Assume firefox has 1.000 users, chromium has 500 users and vivaldi |
29 |
doesn't show up in stats. How does that help us? Would this allow us to |
30 |
skip publishing GLSAs for vivalid because we assume nobody in Gentoo is |
31 |
using vivaldi? Does it allow Python project to go forward pushing a mask |
32 |
for removal in case vivaldi would depend on Python version, Python |
33 |
project want to get rid of? Would this allow Gentoo PR to make a public |
34 |
statement like "Firefox is the most popular browser in Gentoo, twice as |
35 |
users as chromium"? |
36 |
|
37 |
Yes it would be a signal but a useless signal, not? |
38 |
|
39 |
|
40 |
-- |
41 |
Regards, |
42 |
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer |
43 |
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5 |