| 1 |
On Tue, 5 May 2020 02:47:48 +0200 |
| 2 |
Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Yes it would be a signal but a useless signal, not? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
"There are no users reported using this dist, so we can nuke it" is |
| 7 |
still far far superior to "there are no reverse dependencies, so we can |
| 8 |
nuke it" |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
*Even* when the former is false information. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
As presently, the "no reverse dependencies, therefore nuke" essentially |
| 13 |
asserts there *are* no users to consider. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
So the *worst* case scenario for decisions made with these statistics |
| 16 |
is our *current* case. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Even if *nobody* uses the service and *all* results indicates "nobody |
| 19 |
uses anything", then we'll just be reverting to what we currently do: |
| 20 |
Remove things entirely on conjecture that they're not useful. |
Archives