| 1 |
El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 14:09 +0000, Duncan escribió: |
| 2 |
> Pacho Ramos posted on Sun, 16 Jun 2013 15:19:26 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> > El dom, 16-06-2013 a las 12:42 +0000, Duncan escribió: |
| 5 |
> >> Pacho Ramos posted on Sat, 15 Jun 2013 22:37:50 +0200 as excerpted: |
| 6 |
> >> |
| 7 |
> >> [Snipped as my comment refers to the subject] |
| 8 |
> >> |
| 9 |
> >> Could you split-up announcements like this into multiple announcements, |
| 10 |
> >> so the subject lines remain a reasonable length, please? |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > I am not sure it deserves the effort, or do you have any idea about how |
| 13 |
> > to send all this in splitted mails easily (currently, I need to simply |
| 14 |
> > add all the mask entry and copy it to the mail body) :/ |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> If it's a (semi-)manual process as the "simply add all" seems to imply, |
| 17 |
> you could just do it in smaller chunks, say no more than <arbitrary |
| 18 |
> number, simply eyeballing it's fine> a half-dozen packages at a time, so |
| 19 |
> the subject length stays reasonable. Or as I said if the packages are |
| 20 |
> all related, don't worry about the length as it'd then be reasonably easy |
| 21 |
> to glance at and say "oh, that's nothing I care about anyway" or "that |
| 22 |
> interests me I better look closer". |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
It's a manual process, then, will try to divide them. Currently, length |
| 25 |
depends on how many opened bugs are pending each time I review the |
| 26 |
queue ;) |
Archives