| 1 |
On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:33:00 +0800 |
| 2 |
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 05/01/2013 11:25 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Since people like to start whinging threads every time we have to change |
| 6 |
> > flags on gcc this is a friendly notice of some upcoming changes. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> [snip lots of good ideas] |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Any thoughts? |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> I'm in favour of unleashing 4.8 in ~arch soon - I've been building |
| 13 |
> "everything" with it for a while, I've reached >50% coverage of all |
| 14 |
> packages on amd64, and the amount of new bugs is about the same as still |
| 15 |
> open bugs for 4.7. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> All in all it's a very benign release that (imo) doesn't need to be held |
| 18 |
> back. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Yeah it's been amazingly quiet. The loop transformation improvements may |
| 21 |
only bite us at runtime however (another vote for FEATURES=test by default and |
| 22 |
fix your testsuites people!). In any case I'll be waiting until 4.8.1 until |
| 23 |
unmasking it, if only for superstitious reasons. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
gcc-porting |
| 28 |
toolchain, wxwidgets |
| 29 |
@ gentoo.org |
Archives