Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 19:01:43
Message-Id: pan.2010.03.05.19.01.09@cox.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Split desktop profile patches & news item for review by Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
1 Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as
2 excerpted:
3
4 > How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a
5 > profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be done :-) Just let me know
6
7 That's part 1 (installing), chapter 6 (base system), section 6.b.
8 (portage), heading "Choosing the right profile".
9
10 The handbook (at least the amd64 handbook I checked, presumably they're
11 pretty much the same in this regard) now says to use eselect profile, so
12 as long as it's listing the correct choices, the examples and details
13 don't matter quite so much. However, the examples/details do mention
14 desktop and server profiles (plus no-multilib for amd64) as alternates to
15 the generic arch profile, so they /could/ be changed to additionally
16 mention kde and gnome. But with eselect profile doing the heavy lifting
17 already, I'd not call it critical.
18
19 But be sure that eselect is getting the correct listing... for all archs.
20 =:^)
21
22 --
23 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
24 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
25 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review Theo Chatzimichos <tampakrap@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches & news item for review Zeerak Mustafa Waseem <zeerak.w@×××××.com>