Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Kenworthy <billk@×××××××××.au>
To: Steven Stillaway <steve@×××××××××.net>
Cc: gentoo-dev List <gentoo-dev@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)]
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:36:11
Message-Id: 1032478566.325.1.camel@rattus.localdomain
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)] by Steven Stillaway
1 I agree, this could be very counter productive. By all means have some
2 private commincation channels for core developers, but this looks too
3 much closed source/microsoftish
4
5 BillK
6
7 On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 03:30, Steven Stillaway wrote:
8 > > * GDN would only be accessible to registered Developers (with
9 > > perhaps different access levels)
10 >
11 >
12 > Putting ACL's on the developer content is completely counter
13 > productive in an open source project IMHO.
14 >
15 > Why are you trying to make it more difficult for people who are
16 > interested in hacking gentoo (and hopefully contributing back) to
17 > do so.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: gentoo.org reorg (GDN/GUN)] Matthew Walker <mwalker@×××××××.net>