| 1 |
Another ditto here. |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
I see absolutely no reason to do this. ACL's on editting stuff, yes. On |
| 4 |
reading it? No! Shouldn't even have to log in to use it at all. Having a |
| 5 |
login for those who /wish/ to have one would be nice, and could maybe give |
| 6 |
them some extra features. But the general information in the developers |
| 7 |
section should be available to all. That is, afterall, the spirit of open |
| 8 |
source. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Matthew |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
William Kenworthy said: |
| 13 |
> I agree, this could be very counter productive. By all means have some |
| 14 |
> private commincation channels for core developers, but this looks too much |
| 15 |
> closed source/microsoftish |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> BillK |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 03:30, Steven Stillaway wrote: |
| 20 |
>> > * GDN would only be accessible to registered Developers (with |
| 21 |
>> > perhaps different access levels) |
| 22 |
>> |
| 23 |
>> |
| 24 |
>> Putting ACL's on the developer content is completely counter |
| 25 |
>> productive in an open source project IMHO. |
| 26 |
>> |
| 27 |
>> Why are you trying to make it more difficult for people who are |
| 28 |
>> interested in hacking gentoo (and hopefully contributing back) to do so. |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> _______________________________________________ |
| 32 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 33 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o |
| 34 |
> http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives