Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 10:55:48 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20080530115538.22e0dccf@snowcone | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? by Peter Volkov |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 30 May 2008 10:55:51 +0400 |
| 2 | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > В Чтв, 29/05/2008 в 11:02 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò пишет: |
| 4 | > > I'm afraid that it will turn, for complex libraries like libexpat |
| 5 | > > and users not using --as-needed, the message telling you the |
| 6 | > > program cannot be started with subtle crashes for symbol collision. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Is there any reason why --as-needed is not enabled "by default"? |
| 9 | |
| 10 | --as-needed is fundamentally broken by design and causes legitimate code |
| 11 | to break. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | -- |
| 14 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |