Archives
Archives
| From: | Peter Volkov <pva@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 06:58:59 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1212130551.29080.118.camel@camobap | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? by Marius Mauch |
||
| 1 | В Чтв, 29/05/2008 в 11:02 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò пишет: |
| 2 | > I'm afraid that it will turn, for complex libraries like libexpat and |
| 3 | > users not using --as-needed, the message telling you the program cannot |
| 4 | > be started with subtle crashes for symbol collision. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Is there any reason why --as-needed is not enabled "by default"? |
| 7 | |
| 8 | -- |
| 9 | Peter. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | Mike Auty <ikelos@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default? | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |