1 |
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 18:14:58 +0200 |
2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> Under that new scheme, how would I apply patches unpacked into |
5 |
> WORKDIR? In EAPI 6, I can put them into the PATCHES variable and use |
6 |
> the default src_prepare to process it. |
7 |
|
8 |
oh. Right. Huh, I had somehow overlooked there was already a PATCHES in EAPI6, |
9 |
because I'd been using an equivalent since EAPI5 :) |
10 |
|
11 |
Right, so this would kill 90% of my suggestion by already-being-defined. |
12 |
|
13 |
So the only remaining thing to think about in terms of usefulness is the ability |
14 |
for repoman to potentially validate entries in PATCHES. |
15 |
|
16 |
In your scenario where you have local patches instead of patches in ${FILESDIR}, what |
17 |
does the contents of PATCHES look like? |
18 |
|
19 |
Would there be a way to identify entries in PATCHES that are children of ${FILESDIR} |
20 |
during `repoman full` and assert they exist? |