Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:17:18
Message-Id: 1177517569.15811.61.camel@inertia.twi-31o2.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 by Jakub Moc
1 On Wed, 2007-04-25 at 08:55 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
2 > On a general note - if you are unable to agree upon an acceptable
3 > solution, then better refrain from taking 'emergency' measures on
4 > issues where there's no emergency whatsoever. There's been a bug open
5 > for over two months and noone ever suggested that I'd be a case for
6 > urgent council decision.
7
8 I don't understand how nobody can see that the *TEMPORARY* injunction
9 against packages using this versioning scheme was put into place
10 *BECAUSE* nobody could agree on the solution.
11
12 Actually, nevermind. I digress. You're right. The Council screwed up.
13 Feel free to give us all our 50 lashings and we'll be done with this
14 crap.
15
16 --
17 Chris Gianelloni
18 Release Engineering Strategic Lead
19 Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams
20 Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee
21 Gentoo Foundation

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@×××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [ANN] Multiple version suffixes illegal in gentoo-x86 Jakub Moc <jakub.moc@×××××.com>