1 |
On Saturday 21 March 2009 14:50:08 Robert Buchholz wrote: |
2 |
> On Saturday 21 March 2009, Markos Chandras wrote: |
3 |
> > Doing some research I found out that perforce-cli was in the portage |
4 |
> > back in 2006 but not anymore. Can somebody recall the reason why it |
5 |
> > is not there anymore? If it wasn't a license issue , I want to bring |
6 |
> > it back ( at least the client for now ). |
7 |
> > I am waiting your suggestions. Thank you |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Revisiting old bugs, it seems it was removed due to distfile collisions |
10 |
> (same name, different content in several perforce packages): |
11 |
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/123923 |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Since we have src_uri arrows now, this is no show-stopper. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Robert |
17 |
Robert, |
18 |
I already used src_uri arrows on that ebuild. The thing is that I don't know |
19 |
how mirrors treat the arrows. Will mirrors save the file using the the normal |
20 |
filename or the one I specified on arrow? If the later, I need to have |
21 |
RESTRICT="nomirror" or something. I took a look on EAPI2 specifications but |
22 |
couldn't find how mirrors behave with arrows. |
23 |
About the licensing issue, i think that the best is to make it dual license |
24 |
cause this is what I get by reading their site over and over again. |
25 |
|
26 |
If there are no objections, this package will be on tree withing the next 48 |
27 |
hours. |
28 |
|
29 |
Thanks |
30 |
- - |
31 |
Markos Chandras (hwoarang) |
32 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |
33 |
KDE/Qt/Sunrise/Sound |
34 |
Web: http://hwoarang.silverarrow.gr |