| 1 |
Alexander Gretencord <arutha@×××.de> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Anyway, one thing I hated about the "discussion" was the arguments |
| 3 |
> against vi and for nano (space which is a non issue). We don't want |
| 4 |
> vim with syntax highlighting and all that stuff which gets quite big, |
| 5 |
> just a small lil vi. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
I think the main argument against vi was, that it is hard to use for |
| 8 |
somebody not knowing vi. Nano may not be as nice, but everybody should |
| 9 |
be able to use it without learning too much. Vi can be emerged just |
| 10 |
after bootstrapping. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Just remember: If everybody is complaining, it is the right compromise ;-) |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Regards |
| 15 |
Nils |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
( And yes, i use vi(m) too ) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Before you open your mouth to speak, please make sure it's an |
| 21 |
improvement upon the silence. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Nils Decker <ndecker@×××.de> |
Archives