1 |
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 01:01 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:38:48PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
3 |
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/xml/conduct.html |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > If you choose the latter option, please ensure members of the |
6 |
> > Infrastructure project have reviewed and approved the proxy |
7 |
> > relationship to avoid having access cut off for both developers. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> In other words, if suspended dev A notices something's broken, and |
10 |
> dev B (not suspended) agrees, dev B is required to leave it broken until |
11 |
> infra makes a decision. I assume that's not the intent, so could that |
12 |
> sentence please be reworded or dropped? |
13 |
|
14 |
|
15 |
I dropped it. |
16 |
It was unofficially decided last week that having to have |
17 |
proxy commits monitored for a suspended dev pretty much |
18 |
would be a moot point. |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
22 |
Gentoo Linux |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |