Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 23:56:49
Message-Id: 1144108388.6079.10.camel@localhost
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] adding a code of conduct by "Harald van Dijk"
1 On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 01:01 +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
2 > On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:38:48PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/xml/conduct.html
4 >
5 > > If you choose the latter option, please ensure members of the
6 > > Infrastructure project have reviewed and approved the proxy
7 > > relationship to avoid having access cut off for both developers.
8 >
9 > In other words, if suspended dev A notices something's broken, and
10 > dev B (not suspended) agrees, dev B is required to leave it broken until
11 > infra makes a decision. I assume that's not the intent, so could that
12 > sentence please be reworded or dropped?
13
14
15 I dropped it.
16 It was unofficially decided last week that having to have
17 proxy commits monitored for a suspended dev pretty much
18 would be a moot point.
19
20 --
21 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
22 Gentoo Linux
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list