| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 14:04:19 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 |
| 3 |
> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > Right now we have the following components: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > - Applications, |
| 8 |
> > - baselayout, |
| 9 |
> > - Core system, |
| 10 |
> > - Development, |
| 11 |
> > - Eclasses and Profiles, |
| 12 |
> > - Games, |
| 13 |
> > - GCC Porting, |
| 14 |
> > - GNOME, |
| 15 |
> > - Hardened, |
| 16 |
> > - Java, |
| 17 |
> > - KDE, |
| 18 |
> > - Keywording & Stabilization, |
| 19 |
> > - Library, |
| 20 |
> > - New packages ('New ebuilds' previously), |
| 21 |
> > - Printing, |
| 22 |
> > - SELinux, |
| 23 |
> > - Server, |
| 24 |
> > - Unspecified. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> Revision two: |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> - Current packages [bug-wranglers@], |
| 29 |
> - Eclasses [bug-wranglers@], |
| 30 |
> - Hardened [hardened@], |
| 31 |
> - New packages [bug-wranglers@], |
| 32 |
> - Overlays [overlays@], |
| 33 |
> - Profiles [bug-wranglers@], |
| 34 |
> - SELinux [selinux@]. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Why hardened and selinux are separate? |
| 37 |
Having large classes like core/kde/gnome was good too imho. |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
Looks fine otherwise. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
Best regards, |
| 42 |
Andrew Savchenko |
Archives