| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA256 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 18/01/13 07:24 AM, vivo75@×××××.com wrote: |
| 5 |
> Since for servers predictable names are useful and for desktop |
| 6 |
> (which usually have only one ethernet that never change) Is it |
| 7 |
> possible to set desktop profiles to still use ethX, and base |
| 8 |
> profile to use new naming scheme? |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> For wireless situation may be different, many of them are |
| 11 |
> external, could wireless be managed differently? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
In short, no. At least, not unless the functionality that is |
| 15 |
currently a configure-time thing is changed into a |
| 16 |
build-time/install-time thing controlled via a use flag. |
| 17 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 18 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
iF4EAREIAAYFAlD5TxkACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCQHAD7BEIoXLuskCfv/TllbCDaW94u |
| 21 |
84t/PufZ03LJLjqzWlAA/Azuvil7oLWAzTxSDuHT+oheJsPvf4tBFmQUojSf+WIj |
| 22 |
=FOCB |
| 23 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives