| 1 |
Il 09/01/2013 23:13, William Hubbs ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> All, |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> as you probably know by now, udev-197 has hit the tree. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> This new version implements a new feature called predictable network |
| 7 |
> interface names [1], which I have currently turned off for live systems, because it |
| 8 |
> will require migration on the part of the user. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> When you upgrade to this new version of udev, you will find a file |
| 11 |
> /etc/udev/rules.d/80-net-name-slot.rules on your system. It currently |
| 12 |
> has comments explaining what is happening. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> As long as this file is in place, this feature is not activated. That is |
| 15 |
> why there is not a news item. If you do nothing, nothing changes. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> What I would like to do is find some people who are willing to migrate |
| 18 |
> and report any issues they find. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> I would like this to be the default for everyone at some point, so I |
| 21 |
> want to document the migration process and find out if there are any |
| 22 |
> bugs in tools because they expect the eth* names. |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> Thoughts? |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> William |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> [1] |
| 29 |
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames |
| 30 |
Since for servers predictable names are useful and for desktop (which |
| 31 |
usually have only one ethernet that never change) |
| 32 |
Is it possible to set desktop profiles to still use ethX, and base |
| 33 |
profile to use new naming scheme? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
For wireless situation may be different, many of them are external, |
| 36 |
could wireless be managed differently? |
Archives