1 |
On Thursday 03 January 2008, Wulf C. Krueger wrote: |
2 |
> On Thursday, 03. January 2008 11:18:19 Richard Brown wrote: |
3 |
> > While this thread remains highly entertaining, I'm sure as a past |
4 |
> > gentoo developer Roy remembers that we don't generally use gentoo-dev |
5 |
> > to bug fix poorly written makefiles, |
6 |
> |
7 |
> First of all, OpenRC is likely to become an integral part of Gentoo so its |
8 |
> discussion is most likely on-topic here. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Furthermore, I prefer reading about "poorly written" Makefiles instead of |
11 |
> poorly written mails, dear Richard. |
12 |
|
13 |
come guys, lesbie friends. Richard has a point that discussing broken |
14 |
makefiles generally isnt on topic for the list, but it'd be hard to maintain |
15 |
separate threads properly (off-list/somewhere else about building, on-list |
16 |
about conventions/changes/etc...). people miss things and the threads get |
17 |
fragmented and it's a mess. so please just bear the brunt of the on/off |
18 |
topic pieces as in the end the winner clearly is us. |
19 |
|
20 |
> You might want to remember that subscription to his mailinglist is no |
21 |
> longer mandatory if technical discussions bother you so much. |
22 |
|
23 |
this really wasnt needed. he had a valid concern. please give up some hugz. |
24 |
-mike |