Archives
Archives
| From: | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch still no helper function? [from eutils.eclass] | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:41:16 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAAr7Pr9sqagtRg8Mbx12uXSzeozNkEcwCcFCgjg1EF0dqjzs6A@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] epatch still no helper function? [from eutils.eclass] by hasufell |
||
| 1 | On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > "epatch" is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not |
| 3 | > implemented as a real helper function. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you |
| 7 | have to do things like test which version of epatch the package |
| 8 | manager provides....sounds a lot like EAPI :) |
| 9 | |
| 10 | -A |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch still no helper function? [from eutils.eclass] | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> |