| 1 |
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:33 PM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> > "epatch" is so widely used and basic that I wonder why it's still not |
| 3 |
> > implemented as a real helper function. |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> Because then its harder to change, it must be in PMS, otherwise you |
| 6 |
> have to do things like test which version of epatch the package |
| 7 |
> manager provides....sounds a lot like EAPI :) |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
You know, that's actually a pretty good case *for* base.eclass, eutils.eclass |
| 11 |
and similar... we should probably move more functions there... :D |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
-- |
| 14 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
| 15 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
| 16 |
kde, sci, arm, tex, printing |
Archives