| 1 |
On 16 June 2013 08:08, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." <phajdan.jr@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 6/12/13 11:51 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Still seems like working in gentoo-x86 without doing stabilization |
| 4 |
>> would cover most of those bases. Working in the unstable main tree is |
| 5 |
>> still a lot better than keeping stuff out there in an overlay, IMO. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> +1 |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> This works really well for the Gentoo Chromium team, where we have just |
| 10 |
> hard masked packages and ~arch packages right in the tree. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
In this is a continuation of a 'gentoo-haskell' sub-thread I have to say that |
| 13 |
Chromium and co. it not a development library this is a end user application. |
| 14 |
End user applications should be in tree (except for some testing reasons), if |
| 15 |
not just ignore this letter. And thanks for your work. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Alexander |
Archives