Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Olivier CrĂȘte" <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2004 06:47:45
Message-Id: 1075186049.4264.1.camel@TesterTop.tester.ca
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme by Blake Matheny
1 Hi,
2
3 I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like
4 dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp...
5
6 My 0.02 Euro
7
8 Olivier
9
10 On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 06:37, Blake Matheny wrote:
11 > I think that's a good idea. Matt, what do you think?
12 >
13 > -Blake
14 >
15 > Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis?
16 > > I'd be more inclined to go with lisp-scheme and lisp-cl categories in
17 > > the same vein as the games group did with app-games.
18 > > --
19 > > Seemant Kulleen
20 > > Developer and Project Co-ordinator,
21 > > Gentoo Linux http://dev.gentoo.org/~seemant
22 > >
23 > > Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3458780E
24 > > Key fingerprint = 23A9 7CB5 9BBB 4F8D 549B 6593 EDA2 65D8 3458 780E
25 > >
26 --
27 Olivier CrĂȘte
28 tester@g.o
29 Gentoo Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme Blake Matheny <jake@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme Matthew Kennedy <mkennedy@g.o>