Archives
Archives
| From: | Blake Matheny <jake@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Olivier Cr?te <tester@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme | ||
| Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2004 07:46:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20040127080223.GB5541@dev.gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme by "Olivier Crête" |
||
| 1 | Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? |
| 2 | > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like |
| 3 | > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp... |
| 4 | Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go |
| 5 | would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | -Blake |
| 8 | |
| 9 | -- |
| 10 | Blake Matheny |
| 11 | jake@g.o Computer Science is merely the post-Turing |
| 12 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~jake/ decline in formal systems theory. |
| 13 | http://mkfifo.net/gpg.key |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] New Portage Category: dev-scheme | Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> |