| 1 |
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:02:23AM -0500, in |
| 2 |
<20040127080223.GB5541@××××××××××.org>, Blake Matheny <jake@g.o> |
| 3 |
wrote: |
| 4 |
> Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? |
| 5 |
> > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like |
| 6 |
> > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp... |
| 7 |
> Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go |
| 8 |
> would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done. |
| 9 |
I know convention states that categories will be named <type>-<subtype> |
| 10 |
and, by the "games" precedent, split into <subtype>-<subsubtype> when |
| 11 |
necessary. Is there anything that actually stops us from using more than |
| 12 |
one dash in a category name? I can see that this opens a huge can-o-worms, |
| 13 |
but how about dev-lisp, dev-lisp-clisp, dev-lisp-scheme, etc.? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Batou: Hey, Major... You ever hear of "human rights"? |
| 18 |
Kusanagi: I understand the concept, but I've never seen it in action. |
| 19 |
--Ghost in the Shell |
Archives