| 1 |
On Tue, 2004-01-27 at 04:14, Drake Wyrm wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 03:02:23AM -0500, in |
| 3 |
> <20040127080223.GB5541@××××××××××.org>, Blake Matheny <jake@g.o> |
| 4 |
> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Whatchu talkin' 'bout, Willis? |
| 6 |
> > > I think dev-cl doesnt tell much, might be better to have something like |
| 7 |
> > > dev-clisp.. and while we're at it.. dev-lisp... |
| 8 |
> > Not what I was suggesting. As seemant said, I think a good direction to go |
| 9 |
> > would be lisp-clisp, lisp-scheme, etc as the game categories have done. |
| 10 |
> I know convention states that categories will be named <type>-<subtype> |
| 11 |
> and, by the "games" precedent, split into <subtype>-<subsubtype> when |
| 12 |
> necessary. Is there anything that actually stops us from using more than |
| 13 |
> one dash in a category name? I can see that this opens a huge can-o-worms, |
| 14 |
> but how about dev-lisp, dev-lisp-clisp, dev-lisp-scheme, etc.? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I am pretty sure that categories can only have one dash. At least I |
| 17 |
know that was true, but I am not positive if it still holds to be the |
| 18 |
same. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
-- |
| 21 |
Chris Gianelloni |
| 22 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 23 |
Games Team |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Is your power animal a penguin? |
Archives