| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Saturday 10 July 2004 01:18 pm, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 13:19, Jeff Smelser wrote: |
| 6 |
> > because I was told kde isn't ready simply because its not 30 days. your |
| 7 |
> > telling me now its just a guidline, which is what I thought in the |
| 8 |
> > beginning.. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > Its come back full circle. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> Not exactly... we've said over and over again that a package should |
| 13 |
> remain for ~30 days simply to weed out bugs. It's been 30 days. I |
| 14 |
> *never* said that KDE was not stable because it had not been in testing |
| 15 |
> for 30 days, but rather that you should wait until at least 30 days of |
| 16 |
> no bugs until asking why. That part is pretty clear in the afore quoted |
| 17 |
> text. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Well, my intention was to find out how I could get it released. Thats it. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> > Like I have said, over and over.. How can I get kde released? Celeb told |
| 22 |
> > me its ready, he hasn't had time to repoman and blah blah. I am asking |
| 23 |
> > now, what i can do to get it arched.. This is a positive discussion on |
| 24 |
> > how to move this forward. If I can't do it, then so be it. |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> How can you get KDE released? You can't. Only a developer with CVS |
| 27 |
> access can do that. You can *help* by testing and whatnot, but in the |
| 28 |
> end, without access to commit to the CVS tree, you cannot complete a |
| 29 |
> release. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Well, then I guess I am just suppose to wait till someone has time to do it. |
| 32 |
Which leads me back to what I had planned to do in the beginning. See if |
| 33 |
there is a solution we can come up with.Why not have have a single developer, |
| 34 |
per herd maybe if the herd is big, that his/her sole responsibility is to |
| 35 |
release software? Celeb doesn't have time, so he shoots and email to so and |
| 36 |
so, and he tells them to release it? |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
> As for me personally attacking you, I've done no such thing. I have |
| 39 |
> attacked *the way* that you have been portraying yourself through the |
| 40 |
> words you have chosen with your emails. However, I have definitely been |
| 41 |
> out of line in some of my comments, and for that, I apologise. I just |
| 42 |
> get tired of hearing users time and time again point out all of our |
| 43 |
> flaws with nothing helpful to say, until later when we point out that |
| 44 |
> their original comments were inflammatory. |
| 45 |
|
| 46 |
Lets just move on, we all said things we probably regret.. |
| 47 |
|
| 48 |
> Besides... why in the world would you want to use KDE anyway? Gnome is |
| 49 |
> *way* better... |
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
I hate redhat, which in turn, makes me hate gnome since they use to be so tied |
| 52 |
to it.. And sill are? You have no idea what I would like to do to gnome and |
| 53 |
redhat for that matter. |
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
Jeff |
| 56 |
- -- |
| 57 |
======================================================================= |
| 58 |
Jabber: tradergt@(smelser.org|jabber.org) |
| 59 |
Quote: ARRRGGHH!!!! ... (The sound of someone actually learning something) |
| 60 |
======================================================================= |
| 61 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 62 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) |
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
iD8DBQFA8Vvjld4MRA3gEwYRAozUAKCSz2heHQo41/xDnAvR2jqcIRpnIgCZAa69 |
| 65 |
5g04Z7I70jtaiC2JfhBMIU4= |
| 66 |
=Kbbw |
| 67 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
-- |
| 70 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives