Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal?
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 22:43:04
Message-Id: 4A284DCA.7090007@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal? by Ulrich Mueller
1 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 > In last week's council meeting a policy for removal of old eclasses
3 > has been defined:
4 > ,----
5 > | The council voted that to remove eclasses devs should take the
6 > | following steps:
7 > | 1) Deprecate eclasses.
8 > | 2) Removal of all functionality relating to installing.
9 > | 3) After two years the eclass may be removed.
10 > `----
11 >
12 > A quick scan shows that the following eclasses were deprecated more
13 > than three years ago, and are used by no ebuild in the tree:
14 >
15 > 2002-05-25 inherit.eclass
16 > 2003-12-11 kde-i18n.eclass
17 > 2004-04-16 koffice-i18n.eclass
18 > 2005-09-18 jakarta-commons.eclass
19 > 2006-02-28 php.eclass
20 > 2006-02-28 php-2.eclass
21 >
22 > Do we want to remove any of these? Have I missed other candidates?
23 >
24 > Ulrich
25 >
26
27 I would say that we should remove eclasses at earliest two years from
28 now. The benefit from removing now is near zero and there's some people
29 lurking around that haven't updated in ages.
30
31 Regards,
32 Petteri

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Old eclasses - candidates for removal? "Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto" <jmbsvicetto@g.o>